Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Research Paper Topic


For my research paper, I really want to look at social media.  I’m interested so much in the relationship between social media and journalism because I find myself drawn to the Internet’s wealth of available information and the capacity for people to create the idea of news and not just react to it. Social media, I think, is becoming a kind of journalism. Twitter can force headlines. The community can control the information the community is exposed to. It’s that relationship to social media that I want to focus on, I think, where people are attracted to different manners of expressing themselves to a variety of audiences. Why are people enamored of their ability to interact with news? I may not know what’s happening from the news sphere, per se, but I can check Twitter and get my bearings.  I’m fascinated by seemingly everyone’s desire to be witty and charming and wildly informative on the Internet. What is it that is so appealing about journalism through social media? I think it’s the acceptability of other people. I think social media has created a place where I don’t have to accept some higher news power’s deduction of events. I think the citizens’ accounts of events are becoming as important as mainstream news. I think newspapers are expensive and blogging is free and this disparity allows bloggers everywhere to influence a greater audience because of their universality.  After some casual googling, I’ve decided to focus on what people are drawn to in social media, and how it affects journalism as a medium and the idea of objectivity in the sea of all these perspectives.


Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Social Business Culture


I’m interested in social media for my research paper, and it’s not necessarily as relevant to my economic/financial responsibility here, but I’m going to try and make it work. There are businesses involved here, too.

IBM doesn’t want people to do business with companies. They’re adamant that people do business with people-hence, the need to become a social business. This doesn’t mean a company with Facebook and Twitter accounts. These “social businesses” are not just striving for more fans or followers, but software and hardware tools that enable them to foster people’s new relationships and to help them “accomplish tasks, make decisions, and inspire new ideas.”  These improvements in business operation seek to remove the obstacles between “creativity, innovation, and alignment” and business needs.
 
This invented culture seeks to combine expertise and insight from anywhere in the business network at the right time to quickly adapt and improve business outcomes.  This would mean customers, employees, and partners would all aid in speeding up business information. Opportunities would evolve with everyone’s help. This kind of information sharing is similar to the advent of the Internet, but not limited to the web in people to people interactions. People ultimately drive business, so the thought process is that they should be included at every step. They can drive business results themselves, just given the right information.

With the abundance of technology currently available, I see the useful ness of a “social business” classification. But right now, it’s just a classification. I’m not surprised that IBM wants to attract attention to itself by this new way of defining itself. It’s all very easy to say about yourself, but it’s more difficult to find concrete results that are based not on correlation, but causality. 

Harvard Pride


I found it particularly interesting that President Obama would appeal to college students for the next election through writing directly to them. I think the political sphere can sometimes get lost in academia unless students themselves are addressed. I think the idea that Obama plays with, the “Know Before You Owe” sheets, would help the financial crisis by educating the next generation of voters. Obama does not over impose his political beliefs here- they are alluded to more than expressed- “it’s been so disappointing to see Republicans in Congress block jobs bills from going forward”, but he does state that he will boldly act if Congress won’t.
I’m not well versed in matters of The Harvard Crimson, but I thought it was striking that the president is appealing to his alma mater in regards to their significance as a voting base, and also as a manner of personally getting out his sentiments regarding his intended political action and his personal battle with college loan debt. He harps upon the importance of an education even in this fiscal climate, by qualifying the pursuit and investment of education as “[believing] in the future of America”. He also links the personal battle of stripping part of paychecks for debt to the collective economic crisis facing the nation and how painful its influence is felt in the economy. The personal style invoked here speaks particularly to the desired votes and also the environment in which students may feel more comfortable being spoken to.


Thursday, October 20, 2011

links

A clip from a new movie Margin Call, whose premise is to let the businesses win, or at least be seen as human. More on why evil executives bring people to the theatres, and a list of recent examples-


Why Hollywood uses the idea of the little guy beating big business to increase its audience-


Why negatively portraying business can serve to drive ticket sales for the average American, and a list of 2010 movies that utilize the big corporations as villains-



Where "Overcoming Bias" speaks briefly on why America is so taken with CEO villains and offers some possible alternative bad guys-

http://www.overcomingbias.com/2010/06/ceo-movie-villains.html
 

Sunday, October 16, 2011

True Enough 3.)

People are given a choice of which news they want to subject themselves too, because they are bombarded with mass media and somehow have to sort through all of it. People are not, however, given a choice of which reality they believe in. We are all choosing what media outlets we trust, and thus what reality we trust to be broadcast to us. We must selectively consume media out of necessity, but we perceive one single reality in the media we keep track of. Farhood Majoo's True Enough explains that the more people “trust those who are like themselves… the more they distrust strangers” (226). The more we trust our selected outlets to bring news to us, the less we trust sources that are less agreeable to our own search for facts. The more we trust our selected outlets for news, the more we unconsciously trust them to bring our reality to us, as well.

 News has come to depend on a kind of deception, in that it relies on our “prior connections” (228). Our biases cannot be undone, but we are not necessarily conscious of them to the extent that we can actively choose news that confirms our beliefs. News, like marketers today, wants to “sell to you without appearing to sell” (202). News wants to appeal to its niche of customers, but without revealing their hand. They are aware of the existence of a niche group. They know that you belong to the niche group, but that you are most likely unaware that you are in a group based upon some common system of beliefs on certain subjects. In such a fashion, mass media has conceivably “mastered a new way to lie” (193). Our news is actually lying to us, and we do not even seem to mind. By utilizing personal biases, and the need to sort through the abundance of available information, so-called “propagandists” can manufacture a reality through which people process information. News creates its own reality without informing its audience that they are actively “engaged in persuasion” (192). We are unaware that our own notions are persuading us to choose certain media, and we are also unaware that our media is persuading us, in turn. We are in a cycle of reconfirmation.  I have a notion of what I desire to be true. Whether I am consciously aware of that desire does not affect the fact the lacks of disconnect between desired reality and reality. What we perceive is our reality. We cannot “see” things that our personal bias has not programmed us to be aware of. We claim to crave objective news, but we are really on the hunt for stories that “corroborate [our] point of view” (150).  The so-called “real” news that we want is the news slanted in such a way that we find it favorable to our own beliefs. We already choose sources that attempt to do this for us. The bias we see in the news “isn’t strategic. It’s real. It’s real to us, at least, and that’s as real as it gets” (158). Our perception of news is our perception of reality, and our perception of reality is the only reality that we know. We cannot remove ourselves from our own reality in search of an Archimedean Point from which to regard everything completely objectively. We assume that our own views are already “essentially objective” (155). We consider ourselves essentially objective. By choosing the news sources that we do, we perceive ourselves as unbiased, and thus the sources that we keep up with are unbiased, also, as they are in line with our own perceived objective views.

The lens through which we see the world transfers over to the information that we ingest. So although the news might be lying to us, it is just as real as we can perceive it. True Enough makes me think that I am only a victim of the news that I subject myself to.

Thursday, October 13, 2011

True Enough 2.)

The idea of “news” is quickly becoming unimportant. I think the most critical aspect has become the media, regardless of what is being represented. True Enough speaks a bit about how news personalities are just that, personalities. The fact that they might be playing an idiot on television does not mean that they are, they are just trying to appeal to their audiences. Appealing to specific targeted audiences, in fact. Apparently, people are responding to the polarization of “news”, if we can even thus label the constant surges of information. Our bias never leaves us, then, and the lens through which we see the world also carries over to the information we ingest.  The idea of selective exposure is not limited to the public sphere, I think its influence is felt everywhere. I see myself out in the real world, consuming, shopping, however you want to qualify it, looking at entire shelves of items, and somehow only being able to see brands/items I’ve been thinking about before- items that perhaps I see myself buying for the simple fact that I’ve been told about them, maybe, or want to be the sort of person who buys such items. Media is overwhelming. The possibility for so much information causes many people to shut down, I think, and this further encourages the fact that people stay in their media comfort zones. It isn’t so much that everyone makes a conscious effort to not consider another view point, but we make an effort to focus on what we easily see ourselves interested in.